INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL HISTORY / VOL. 01

Read the source.
Question the story.

An evidence-led record of the code, languages, algorithms and systems that built computing. We start with artifacts—not legends—and revise claims when the evidence changes.

FIELD / 001HISTORY AS A
VERIFIABLE SYSTEM
RECORD → REVIEW → REVISE
SCROLL TO EXPLORE THE RECORD ↓[ SOURCE / METHODS / PROVENANCE ]
01 / EDITORIAL POSITION

Not a hall of heroes.
A chain of evidence.

Computing history is complicated by lost files, competing recollections and the distance between an idea and its implementation. We distinguish what a document proves, what an experiment demonstrates and what remains interpretation.

Original sourcesVersion-specific claimsReproducible examplesPublic corrections

02 / THE INDEX

Ten disciplines.
One verifiable record.

Browse focused research areas. Each starting dossier explains the questions, methods and source types that will shape future investigations.

10 research dossiers

03 / RESEARCH FIELD NOTE

SOURCE-LED / READABLE / REVISABLE
FIELD NOTE 001 · EVIDENCE: GNU / GIT

From RCS to Git: what changes when history becomes a graph?

A guided comparison of file-oriented revision records and Git's content-addressed object model—with original technical documentation, clear limits and a public revision record.

Read the field note

04 / HOW THE RECORD CHANGES

Publish the evidence.
Keep the correction.

Readers can challenge a claim with a dated source, alternate interpretation or reproducible counterexample. Accepted changes are documented in the revision record; submissions are never silently treated as published facts.

How to improve the record
01

Locate the claim.

Give the exact passage, artifact, version and context.

02

Provide the source.

Link a primary document, original code or reproducible result.

03

Review and revise.

Accepted material changes update the public version record.

THE TECHNICAL RECORD

The code survives.
The explanation must earn its place.